Unit 3 Concept Of Organisations Behaviour Assignment

The multidisciplinary area of organizational behavior (OB) studies how individuals and groups work together inside companies to accomplish shared objectives. This article explores the fundamental ideas, important theories, real-world applications, and development strategies in organizational behavior (OB), emphasizing the role that OB plays in supporting environmentally friendly and sustainable corporate practices. We start by examining the historical advancements in OB and follow its growth from the Industrial Revolution to modern methods that place a strong emphasis on human dynamics. After that, we explore important ideas like group dynamics, organizational structure, individual behavior, and culture, explaining how each influences the effectiveness of an organization. Major OB theories are then explored, including modern theories like motivation theory and leadership theory as well as traditional theories like bureaucracy and scientific management. A section on OB improvement tactics is provided, with the aim of strengthening organizational culture, motivation, and leadership. Case studies are utilized to demonstrate the application of OB principles to practical issues. The article ends by highlighting how important OB is to successfully navigating the complexity of contemporary companies and attaining long-term commercial success.

1. Introduction:

Organizational Behavior (OB) is a field of study that delves into the behavior of individuals and groups within organizations, and how these behaviors influence organizational effectiveness. It draws insights from various disciplines such as psychology, sociology, anthropology, and management theory to understand the complexities of human behavior in the workplace. In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, where sustainability and environmental consciousness are becoming increasingly important, the study of OB takes on added significance. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of OB, exploring its historical development, key concepts, major theories, practical applications, and strategies for improvement.

2. Foundations of Organizational Behavior:

2.1 Historical Development of OB:

The study of OB has evolved significantly over the past century, driven by changing paradigms and societal shifts. Beginning with the Industrial Revolution, which emphasized efficiency and productivity, OB has transitioned to a more nuanced understanding of human dynamics within organizations. Key milestones in its development include Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management, which focused on optimizing job design for efficiency, and the Human Relations Movement, exemplified by the Hawthorne Studies, which underscored the importance of social relations in the workplace. Moreover, the emergence of systems theory in the mid-20th century further contributed to the understanding of organizations as complex systems influenced by various internal and external factors.

2.2 Key Concepts in OB:

Individual Behavior: Individual behavior in organizations is influenced by various factors including personality, attitudes, values, perceptions, and emotions. Understanding these factors can help predict how individuals are likely to behave in different situations, thereby enabling managers to tailor their strategies accordingly. Additionally, research in fields such as personality psychology and cognitive psychology has provided valuable insights into individual differences and decision-making processes within organizations.

Group Dynamics: The behavior of groups within organizations significantly impacts organizational performance. Concepts such as group cohesion, leadership, communication, decision-making, and conflict resolution play pivotal roles in shaping group dynamics and, by extension, organizational outcomes. Moreover, theories such as social identity theory and groupthink shed light on how group processes influence individual behavior and organizational performance.

Organizational Structure and Culture: The structure of an organization and its underlying culture profoundly influence employee behavior and organizational effectiveness. Organizational structure refers to the formal arrangement of roles, responsibilities, and relationships within an organization, while organizational culture encompasses shared values, beliefs, norms, and practices that define the organization’s identity and guide employee behavior. Various models of organizational structure, such as functional, divisional, matrix, and network structures, have been proposed to suit different organizational contexts. Additionally, research on organizational culture has highlighted the importance of creating a strong culture aligned with the organization’s goals and values to foster employee engagement, innovation, and performance.

2.3 The Role of OB in the Workplace:

OB concepts are applied to address various workplace issues, enhance employee satisfaction, and improve organizational performance. For instance, by understanding motivation theories, managers can create environments that foster employee engagement, satisfaction, and productivity. Similarly, knowledge of leadership theories enables managers to develop effective leadership styles and practices that inspire and motivate employees to achieve organizational goals. Furthermore, insights from OB help organizations to effectively manage change, resolve conflicts, promote diversity and inclusion, and build high-performing teams. Overall, OB provides valuable tools and frameworks for understanding and managing human behavior in organizations, thereby contributing to organizational success and sustainability.

3. Major Theories in Organizational Behavior:

3.1 Classical Theories:

Scientific Management: Developed by Frederick Taylor in the late 19th century, Scientific Management aimed to improve organizational efficiency by applying scientific principles to the design of work processes and the selection and training of workers. Taylor emphasized the need for standardization, specialization, time-and-motion studies, and incentive systems to enhance productivity and reduce inefficiencies in organizations. While Scientific Management contributed to significant advancements in industrial efficiency and productivity, it has been criticized for its mechanistic view of workers and its neglect of human factors such as motivation, creativity, and job satisfaction.

Bureaucracy: Proposed by Max Weber in the early 20th century, Bureaucracy is a formal system of organization characterized by hierarchical structure, division of labor, rules and procedures, impersonal relationships, and merit-based selection and promotion. Weber argued that bureaucracy is an efficient and rational form of organization suited to large-scale enterprises and complex tasks. However, critics have highlighted its potential for rigidity, red tape, and inefficiency, as well as its tendency to stifle innovation and creativity.

Administrative Theory: Developed by Henri Fayol in the early 20th century, Administrative Theory focuses on the principles and functions of management applicable to all organizations. Fayol identified five key functions of management—planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling—and proposed fourteen principles of management, including unity of command, division of work, scalar chain, and equity. While Fayol’s principles continue to influence contemporary management practices, they have been criticized for their lack of empirical evidence and their prescriptive and universalistic nature.

3.2 Human Relations Movement:

The Human Relations Movement emerged in the 1930s and 1940s as a response to the limitations of classical theories of management. It emphasized the importance of social factors such as employee morale, motivation, communication, and leadership in influencing organizational performance. The Hawthorne Studies conducted at the Western Electric Hawthorne Works in the 1920s and 1930s played a pivotal role in shaping the Human Relations Movement. These studies revealed that changes in physical and social conditions, such as improved lighting and increased attention from supervisors, led to improvements in employee productivity—a phenomenon known as the Hawthorne Effect. The findings of the Hawthorne Studies challenged the prevailing view that productivity was solely determined by technical and economic factors and highlighted the significance of human factors in organizational performance.

The Human Relations Movement emphasized the importance of creating supportive work environments, fostering open communication, providing opportunities for employee participation and involvement, and recognizing the social and psychological needs of employees. It contributed to the development of theories such as motivation theory, leadership theory, and organizational culture theory, which sought to understand and address the human side of organizations. Moreover, the Human Relations Movement laid the foundation for the field of organizational behavior, which continues to explore the complex interactions between individuals, groups, and organizations in the pursuit of organizational effectiveness and sustainability.

3.3 Contemporary Theories:

Motivation Theories: Motivation is a central concern in organizational behavior, as it plays a critical role in influencing employee behavior, performance, and job satisfaction. Several contemporary theories of motivation have been proposed to understand the factors that drive and sustain employee engagement and productivity.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Abraham Maslow proposed a hierarchical model of human needs, often depicted as a pyramid with five levels: physiological needs, safety needs, belongingness needs, esteem needs, and self-actualization needs. According to Maslow, individuals are motivated to fulfill these needs in a sequential manner, starting with basic physiological needs such as food, water, and shelter, and progressing to higher-order needs such as self-esteem and self-actualization. Maslow’s theory suggests that once lower-level needs are satisfied, individuals are motivated to pursue higher-level needs. In the workplace, managers can use Maslow’s hierarchy to understand employees’ needs and tailor their motivational strategies accordingly.

Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory: Frederick Herzberg proposed a two-factor theory of motivation based on the distinction between hygiene factors and motivators. Hygiene factors, such as salary, working conditions, and company policies, are essential for preventing dissatisfaction but do not necessarily lead to satisfaction or motivation. Motivators, on the other hand, such as challenging work, recognition, and opportunities for growth and advancement, are intrinsic factors that lead to job satisfaction and motivation. According to Herzberg, while hygiene factors can prevent dissatisfaction, motivators are needed to stimulate higher levels of performance and job satisfaction. This theory suggests that managers should focus on providing motivating factors rather than simply addressing hygiene factors to enhance employee motivation and engagement.

McClelland’s Theory of Needs: David McClelland proposed a theory of needs based on three primary needs: achievement, affiliation, and power. According to McClelland, individuals differ in the strength of these needs, and their behavior is influenced by the need that is most dominant. For example, individuals with a high need for achievement are driven by the desire to excel and accomplish challenging tasks, while those with a high need for affiliation seek social connections and harmonious relationships. Managers can use McClelland’s theory to understand employees’ motivational preferences and provide opportunities that align with their dominant needs.

Expectancy Theory: Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory posits that individuals are motivated to act in a certain way based on their expectations of the outcomes of their actions. According to this theory, motivation is influenced by three key factors: expectancy (the belief that effort will lead to performance), instrumentality (the belief that performance will lead to outcomes), and valence (the value or attractiveness of the outcomes). Expectancy theory suggests that individuals are more likely to be motivated when they believe that their efforts will result in desirable outcomes and that they have the ability to achieve those outcomes. Managers can use expectancy theory to identify and address factors that influence employees’ beliefs about effort-performance links, performance-outcome links, and outcome values.

Leadership Theories:

Leadership is another critical aspect of organizational behavior, as effective leadership is essential for inspiring and guiding employees toward the achievement of organizational goals. Various theories of leadership have been proposed to understand the characteristics, behaviors, and styles of effective leaders.

Trait Theories: Trait theories of leadership focus on identifying the personal characteristics and attributes that distinguish effective leaders from non-leaders. According to trait theories, certain traits such as intelligence, charisma, self-confidence, and integrity are associated with effective leadership. Trait-based approaches to leadership have been criticized for their lack of empirical support and their failure to account for situational factors that influence leadership effectiveness.

Behavioral Theories: Behavioral theories of leadership shift the focus from personal traits to observable behaviors and actions exhibited by leaders. Two prominent behavioral theories are the Ohio State Studies and the University of Michigan Studies, which identified two dimensions of leader behavior: consideration (concern for relationships and supportiveness) and initiating structure (concern for task accomplishment and organization). These studies suggested that effective leaders balance consideration and structure in their leadership approach, depending on the needs of their followers and the demands of the situation.

Contingency Theories: Contingency theories of leadership propose that the effectiveness of leadership depends on the interaction between leader traits or behaviors and situational factors. One of the most influential contingency theories is Fiedler’s Contingency Model, which suggests that leadership effectiveness is determined by the match between the leader’s style (relationship-oriented or task-oriented) and the favorableness of the situation (leader-member relations, task structure, and leader position power). Other contingency theories include Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory, which emphasizes the importance of adapting leadership styles to the readiness or maturity of followers, and House’s Path-Goal Theory, which focuses on the leader’s role in clarifying goals, removing obstacles, and providing support to enhance follower motivation and performance.

Transformational Leadership: Transformational leadership theory emphasizes the leader’s ability to inspire and motivate followers to achieve higher levels of performance by articulating a compelling vision, fostering innovation and creativity, and providing individualized support and development opportunities. Transformational leaders are characterized by their charisma, vision, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. Research has shown that transformational leadership is associated with higher levels of follower satisfaction, commitment, and performance, as well as organizational innovation and effectiveness.

Decision-Making and Communication:

Effective decision-making and communication are crucial for organizational success, as they facilitate coordination, collaboration, and alignment of efforts toward common goals. Organizational behavior provides insights into the decision-making processes and communication dynamics within organizations, helping managers to make better decisions and communicate more effectively.

Decision-Making Processes: Decision-making in organizations involves identifying problems or opportunities, generating alternative solutions, evaluating alternatives, making choices, and implementing decisions. Various decision-making models, such as the rational model, the bounded rationality model, and the intuitive model, describe how decisions are made under different conditions and constraints. Additionally, research in behavioral economics and cognitive psychology has highlighted the role of biases, heuristics, and emotions in decision-making, influencing the quality and outcomes of decisions.

Communication Processes: Communication is the process of exchanging information, ideas, and emotions through verbal and nonverbal channels. Effective communication is essential for transmitting organizational goals, objectives, expectations, and feedback, as well as fostering collaboration, trust, and engagement among employees. Various communication theories, such as social exchange theory, social identity theory, and uncertainty reduction theory, explain how communication processes influence attitudes, behaviors, and relationships within organizations. Moreover, advancements in communication technologies, such as email, instant messaging, video conferencing, and social media, have transformed the way organizations communicate, enabling faster, more efficient, and more collaborative communication across geographic and cultural boundaries.

4. Practical Applications of Organizational Behavior:

4.1 Case Studies:

Tech Startup Transformation: A tech startup struggled with low worker morale and high turnover. By applying Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, the employer delivered bendy running situations, professional development programs, and crew-constructing activities, resulting in improved employee pride and reduced turnover.

Retail Chain Leadership Change: A national retail chain faced declining income and a negative place of work culture. A new CEO implemented a transformational leadership style, encouraging innovation and placing clean desires, which caused a full-size turnaround in the organization’s overall performance and worker engagement.

4.2 Strategies for Improving OB:

Improving organizational tradition, enhancing employee motivation, and fostering effective management are essential for improving OB. This can be performed through open conversation, recognizing employee achievements, offering expert improvement possibilities, and growing advantageous work surroundings. Additionally, organizations can invest in training and development programs to enhance employees’ skills, knowledge, and capabilities, thereby improving job performance and satisfaction. Moreover, organizations can implement flexible work arrangements, such as telecommuting and flexible hours, to accommodate employees’ work-life balance needs and preferences. Furthermore, fostering diversity and inclusion initiatives can create a more inclusive and equitable workplace culture, where employees feel valued, respected, and empowered to contribute their unique perspectives and talents.

5. Conclusion:

In conclusion, Organizational Behavior (OB) is a dynamic and multidisciplinary field that provides valuable insights into the behavior of individuals, groups, and organizations within the workplace. By understanding the foundational concepts, major theories, and practical applications of OB, managers can effectively navigate the complexities of modern organizations and achieve sustainable business success. From historical developments to contemporary approaches, OB offers a wealth of knowledge and tools for enhancing organizational effectiveness, fostering employee engagement, and promoting environmental sustainability. As organizations continue to evolve in response to global challenges and technological advancements, the role of OB will remain pivotal in driving innovation, fostering collaboration, and creating cultures of excellence and integrity. By embracing the principles and practices of OB, organizations can cultivate resilient and adaptive workforces that thrive in an ever-changing world.


  • Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Campbell, T. T. (2017). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
  • Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2008). Behavior in Organizations. Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Daft, R. L., & Lane, P. G. (2017). The Leadership Experience. Cengage Learning.
  • Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in Organizations. Pearson.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Signup our newsletter to get update information, news or insight.

Latest Post